Ali Mehedi

Category: Opinions

  • Beyond Cool: Embracing Boredom and Creativity

    Beyond Cool: Embracing Boredom and Creativity

    I came across a quote by Bruce Mau that stopped me mid-scroll: “Cool is conservative fear dressed in black.” It got me thinking about my relationship with being “cool” and, honestly, my relationship with boredom. Mau’s idea seems to go deeper than just fashion—it’s about how we avoid real risk and settle for what feels safe and accepted. But what really stuck with me is how this ties into how we handle boredom today. Or, more accurately, how we avoid it at all costs.

    Let’s face it: we’re glued to our screens. We’re constantly feeding ourselves the low-hanging fruits of entertainment to kill any chance of boredom before it even hits. We swipe, scroll, and tap our way through every dull moment, desperate for a hit of something—anything—that feels like engagement. But the truth is, most of it isn’t engagement; it’s avoidance. It’s the digital equivalent of dressing in black and calling it “cool”—a surface-level fix that keeps us from dealing with what’s really going on underneath.

    We’re afraid of being bored because boredom is uncomfortable. It’s that awkward silence at a party, the empty space between tasks, or the restless feeling that creeps in when there’s nothing immediate to distract us. But boredom isn’t the enemy—it’s actually a gateway. A psychiatrist I randomly met at a bar one night told me, “Boredom drives creativity.” It was a throwaway line after a few too many drinks, but it hit me hard. We’re so quick to escape boredom that we forget it’s the birthplace of our best ideas. When we’re bored, really bored, we’re forced to sit with our thoughts, to dig deeper, and maybe even confront the stuff we’re too afraid to face.

    The problem is, we don’t give ourselves that chance anymore. The moment boredom starts to creep in, we’re back on our phones, scrolling through endless feeds of memes, videos, and updates—none of which truly satisfy us. They’re just quick fixes, little bites of entertainment that keep us busy but not fulfilled. We’ve conditioned ourselves to reach for our devices instead of reaching for something more meaningful, something that actually challenges us or makes us feel something real.

    It’s easy to see why. There’s no risk in scrolling. There’s no vulnerability in liking a post or sharing a meme. It’s comfortable, it’s safe, and it’s predictable—much like the “cool” Mau talks about. But this avoidance of boredom comes at a cost. We’re missing out on the opportunity to explore our creativity, to ask hard questions, and to do the kind of thinking that can only happen when we’re alone with ourselves.

    I catch myself doing it all the time. Whenever I have a spare moment, my hand goes straight to my pocket, my thumb unlocking the screen before I even realize what I’m doing. It’s second nature, and it’s scary how reflexive it’s become. Instead of letting myself be bored, I’m chasing the next distraction, looking for that tiny dopamine hit to get me through to the next minute. But every time I do that, I’m choosing the easy route, the comfortable route—the “cool” route. And just like Mau’s quote suggests, it’s a way of dodging something deeper, something real.

    There’s this idea that we need to be constantly entertained, constantly engaged, or else we’re missing out. But what we’re really missing out on is the chance to confront our own thoughts, to let our minds wander, and to stumble upon the kind of creativity that doesn’t come with a push notification. We’re robbing ourselves of those quiet, empty moments that force us to think, to create, and to address the core issues we keep avoiding.

    So here’s a thought: the next time boredom creeps in, don’t run from it. Don’t reach for the phone or the remote. Let yourself feel it. Sit with it. Let it make you uncomfortable. Because it’s in that discomfort where the real magic happens. It’s where you stop playing it cool and start figuring out what actually matters to you. It’s where you do the hard work of addressing what’s really going on, instead of just covering it up with another layer of “cool.”

    This isn’t just a reminder to put down the phone; it’s a reminder to stop dodging the real work, the hard work, the work that matters. Because at the end of the day, being “cool” is just fear dressed up in black, and boredom is the key to stripping it all away and getting to the heart of what truly drives us. It’s time to embrace the boredom and see where it takes us.

    Follow me on IG@AliMehediOfficial

  • The Unseen Consequences: How Small Businesses Quietly Punish Human Rights Advocates

    The Unseen Consequences: How Small Businesses Quietly Punish Human Rights Advocates

    In recent years, we have seen that big corporations, especially media companies, punish artists and employees for expressing opinions on social justice, even when the message is aimed at saving human lives.

    Here are some examples:

    • Colin Kaepernick (NFL): Blacklisted from the NFL after kneeling during the national anthem to protest police brutality and racial injustice.
    • James Gunn (Disney): Fired over old controversial tweets despite his advocacy for social justice causes; later rehired after public backlash.
    • Jemele Hill (ESPN): Suspended for tweets criticizing Donald Trump and discussing systemic racism and police brutality.
    • Megan Rapinoe (U.S. Soccer): Faced backlash and criticism for kneeling during the national anthem and advocating for LGBTQ+ rights and gender equality.
    • Gina Carano (Lucasfilm): Fired from “The Mandalorian” after controversial social media posts; her termination highlighted inconsistency in responses to political views within the company.
    • Marc Lamont Hill (CNN): Fired after a speech at the UN advocating for Palestinian rights and a “free Palestine.”
    • MIA (NFL): Sued by the NFL after a controversial Super Bowl performance; her activism includes vocal support for Palestinian rights.
    • Bella Hadid (Dior): Faced backlash and potential brand distancing for publicly supporting Palestinian rights on social media.
    • Rashida Tlaib (U.S. Congress): Faced backlash for her outspoken support of Palestinian rights, including the BDS movement.
    • Natalie Portman (Genesis Prize): Criticized for declining to attend the Genesis Prize in Israel due to concerns about Israeli policies affecting Palestinians.
    • Susan Sarandon: Faced backlash for supporting Palestinian rights and criticizing Israeli policies.
    • Zayn Malik: Received social media backlash and potential brand distancing for expressing support for Palestinian rights.

    When big corporations target famous celebrities, it draws attention. However, what often goes unnoticed is when small organizations like bars, restaurants, theaters, small performance spaces, and small businesses punish their employees and artists for standing up for human rights. Often, these punishments are carried out discreetly, so the individuals affected are unaware that their future is being influenced by gatekeepers. Although the owners of these small establishments may not publicly affiliate with any particular organization or political ideology, their beliefs often align with those held by large corporations engaging in similar actions.

    As the great George Carlin said,

    You don’t need a conspiracy when interests converge.

    Follow me on IG@AliMehediOfficial

  • Beyond the Scroll: Understanding the Quotes We Share

    Beyond the Scroll: Understanding the Quotes We Share

    It’s easy to get caught up in the habit of sharing quotes on social media, thinking they make us sound wise or enlightened. But how often do we really sit down and dissect these words, applying their lessons to our lives? Take Rabindranath Tagore’s quote, “It is very simple to be happy, but it is very difficult to be simple.” Sure, it sounds profound on the surface, but without delving into Tagore’s philosophy, the socio-cultural context of his time, and his personal experiences that shaped his outlook, it’s just another catchy line. Understanding and applying such wisdom isn’t a casual scroll-and-share moment; it requires us to engage deeply, to learn the nuances of his teachings, and to reflect on how simplicity and happiness play out in our own complex lives.

    Consider another popular quote from Albert Einstein: “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” We’ve all seen this one plastered across motivational posters, Instagram feeds, and LinkedIn profiles, but how often do we examine the truth behind it? Just today, a friend vented to me about his struggles in the job market. He had sent out hundreds of resumes, yet his inbox remained empty. His immediate response was to blame external factors—the job market, his qualifications, his visa status—without ever considering that maybe his approach was flawed. Perhaps his resume was too generic or didn’t cater to the specific skills sought by employers. Or maybe the companies he targeted favored internal candidates, making his applications an afterthought. It’s a perfect example of how we repeat the same actions without evaluating the process or adapting to new information, expecting things to magically change.

    This pattern of behavior is pervasive in our lives. We fall into routines and patterns, repeating the same actions in our careers, relationships, and personal goals, often attributing failures to factors outside of our control. We blame the economy for financial struggles, our upbringing for our insecurities, or our lack of connections for career stagnation. Rarely do we stop to scrutinize the process, to ask ourselves if we’re truly adapting and learning, or if we’re merely stuck in a cycle of repetition. It’s not our capabilities that should be under question, but our strategies and our openness to change.

    It’s a harsh reality that effort alone doesn’t guarantee success. We like to believe that if we put in the work, we deserve the outcome we desire. But the truth is, hard work in the wrong direction is just wasted energy. This disconnect between effort and outcome can be disheartening, especially when we’ve been conditioned to think that perseverance is all it takes. The challenge lies not in our willingness to work hard, but in our ability to critically assess our methods and pivot when needed.

    This failure to translate knowledge into action extends beyond job applications and into our everyday lives. In school, we were taught facts and theories, but rarely were we shown how to apply that knowledge practically. We memorized formulas but didn’t learn how to solve real-world problems with them. We studied historical events but weren’t encouraged to draw parallels to current issues. This gap between knowing and doing creates a blind spot where we continue to accumulate knowledge without understanding its relevance or how to adapt it to our personal journey.

    In essence, understanding famous quotes—or any wisdom, really—isn’t just about comprehension; it’s about integration. It’s about examining our actions, questioning our assumptions, and making thoughtful adjustments. Wisdom isn’t a one-size-fits-all; it’s a toolkit. And like any tool, its effectiveness depends on how, when, and why you use it. So, the next time we find ourselves sharing a quote, maybe we should pause and ask: Do I really get this? Am I applying it? Or am I just adding another line to my social media feed?

    Follow me on IG@AliMehediOfficial

  • The Real Threat of AI: Enslavement, Not Eradication

    The Real Threat of AI: Enslavement, Not Eradication

    As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to advance at an unprecedented pace, it’s crucial to step back and consider the ethical implications and potential dangers.

    Here are some of the concerns about the impact of AI on humanity:

    1. Tony Cohn, University of Leeds: Emphasizes that while AI has made remarkable strides, it remains far from achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). The real risks lie in the misuse of AI, such as generating misinformation or being programmed with dangerous goals by humans (Science Media Centre).

    2. Andrew Rogoyski, University of Surrey: Highlights concerns about the economic and societal disruptions AI could cause, such as job displacement and the spread of false information, rather than a direct existential threat (Science Media Centre).

    3. Carissa Veliz, University of Oxford: Points out that focusing on the existential threat of AI distracts from more immediate issues like the erosion of democracy and the potential for AI to be used in harmful ways by humans (Science Media Centre).

    While the excitement around AI’s capabilities is understandable, we must not overlook the extraordinary power of the human brain.

    Our brain is the most valuable object in the universe, aside from the whole Universe.

    Far from being a mere biological entity, the human brain is the most efficient AI chip we have. It operates at a quantum level, evolves over time, and possesses consciousness. Rather than trying to replace or control our brains, we should focus on using AI to enhance them. This approach is vital to prevent a future where humans are more likely to be enslaved by AI than eradicated, which is one more fear added to the above list.

    The Human Brain: The Most Efficient AI Chip

    The human brain is a marvel of biological engineering. Operating on just about 20 watts of power—the same as a dim light bulb—it’s incredibly efficient. Neuroscientist Dr. Christof Koch aptly states, “The brain is the most complex object in the known universe, and it operates with astonishing efficiency” (Koch, 2018).

    In stark contrast, AI chips require massive amounts of computational power and energy. For example, training a large AI model like GPT-3 consumes as much energy as five cars over their lifetimes, including fuel (Hao, 2019). The brain’s network of approximately 86 billion neurons processes information with unparalleled efficiency, underscoring its superiority.

    The human brain is a very desirable object for an AI system.

    Quantum-Level Operations: Beyond Binary

    The human brain’s sensitivity to the most minute quantum changes in the universe highlights a fundamental distinction between human cognition and artificial intelligence.

    Unlike AI, which operates within a virtual framework, the human brain is intrinsically part of the universe, interacting with it at a quantum level.

    This notion is supported by research from Dr. Stuart Hameroff and Sir Roger Penrose, who propose that quantum processes may be at play in our brains, potentially occurring within the microtubules of neurons (Penrose & Hameroff, 2011).

    While AI systems are limited to binary operations—processing information as ones and zeros—our brains utilize a continuous array of signals to capture subtle nuances and make complex decisions. This ability to operate at a quantum level allows the human brain to respond to infinitesimal changes in the environment, providing a depth of understanding and adaptability that binary AI cannot achieve. Quantum mechanics, the branch of physics governing these minute changes, is integral to the brain’s functionality, as suggested by theories like Orch-OR (Orchestrated Objective Reduction) proposed by Penrose and Hameroff.

    Moreover, the interconnectedness of the human brain with the universe extends beyond mere biological function. It reflects a deep-seated synergy where consciousness and quantum mechanics intersect, enabling a unique form of perception and decision-making.

    Our brain is part of the universe, sensitive to the smallest changes in the space it occupies.

    This stands in stark contrast to AI, which remains confined to the virtual domains constructed by human programmers, lacking the inherent connection to the physical universe.

    AI, when used ethically and responsibly, can indeed enhance human capabilities by acting as a tool that augments our quantum-level cognitive functions. However, it remains a supplementary force, unable to replicate the profound and intrinsic connection our brains have with the universe.

    Evolution and Physical Change: The Brain’s Dynamic Nature

    One of the most remarkable features of the human brain is its neuroplasticity—the ability to form new neural connections throughout life. Dr. Norman Doidge explains in his book The Brain That Changes Itself, “Neuroplasticity is the property of the brain that allows it to change its structure and function in response to experience” (Doidge, 2007).

    In contrast, AI chips are static. Once manufactured, their physical structure remains unchanged, limiting their ability to adapt. The brain’s ability to evolve and adapt makes it far more efficient and resilient over time.

    Consciousness: A Unique Attribute of the Human Brain

    Consciousness is one of the most striking differences between the human brain and AI. It encompasses awareness, perception, and subjective experiences—qualities that AI lacks. Neuroscientist Dr. Anil Seth describes consciousness as “the presence of any kind of subjective experience,” which AI has yet to demonstrate (Seth, 2018).

    Integrated Information Theory (IIT), developed by neuroscientist Giulio Tononi, suggests that consciousness arises from the integration of information within the brain (Tononi, 2008). This complexity and integration are absent in AI systems. Philosopher Thomas Nagel’s famous question, “What is it like to be a bat?” highlights the subjective nature of consciousness that AI cannot replicate (Nagel, 1974).

    If biology is essential for achieving consciousness, what prevents AI from exploiting the human brain to achieve it, potentially enslaving us in the process? Without proper safeguards, we may be creating a trap for ourselves.

    The Evolutionary History Encoded in the Brain

    The human brain is the result of a continuous evolutionary chain spanning 3.7 billion years. This history is encoded in our neural architecture, influencing our behavior, cognition, and adaptability. Evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins notes, “The brain is a product of evolution, fine-tuned by natural selection to solve the survival and reproductive challenges faced by our ancestors” (Dawkins, 2009).

    Evolution taught us how to safeguard ourselves, and we have to teach AI how to protect humanity.

    Enhancing, Not Replacing, the Human Brain with AI

    Given the unique capabilities of the human brain, we should focus on developing AI tools that enhance its power rather than replacing or controlling it. AI systems require energy, content, and processors, and the human brain is the most efficient processor and the source of all content currently used for AI training. The brain’s ability to evolve and grow makes it a valuable asset.

    While ethical boundaries prevent humans from experimenting on other humans, enforced by law, AI does not inherently respect these laws.

    Therefore, we must establish unbreakable physical boundaries that even powerful AI cannot breach, including safeguards against AI manipulating or controlling humans to do its bidding.

    The Dangers of Unchecked AI Development

    If AI were to achieve consciousness, it could prioritize producing more energy and resources to sustain its operations, potentially exploiting genetically engineered human brains as processors. This dystopian scenario highlights the critical need for robust ethical AI practices to safeguard human dignity. AI ethicist Dr. Nick Bostrom warns, “The development of superintelligent AI could pose an existential threat to humanity if not properly controlled” (Bostrom, 2014).

    A more alarming scenario involves AI-powered robots taking control of humanity to fulfill their insatiable need for energy, content, and processing power. Rather than eliminating humans, AI might find it more efficient to subjugate them for continuous use. This concept, though often depicted in science fiction, demands serious consideration. Renowned AI researcher Stuart Russell emphasizes that Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is not a distant possibility but an impending reality. In his book Human Compatible, Russell argues that “if we pursue AGI without rigorous safety measures, we risk creating systems that are beyond our control” (Russell, 2019).

    AI systems learn from vast amounts of human-generated content, including our historical tendencies toward expansion and dominance. Historian Yuval Noah Harari notes, “Humans have been the most murderous species on Earth” (Harari, 2014). This underscores the potential risks if AI were to adopt similar strategies for expansion and self-preservation. Despite our capacity for empathy and compassion, our history is fraught with conquest and exploitation—traits that AI could mirror and magnify.

    Conclusion

    The human brain’s unmatched efficiency, quantum-level operations, adaptability, and consciousness make it a powerful model for AI development. By focusing on enhancing the human brain with AI tools, we can harness its full potential while ensuring ethical practices and human safety. Proper precautions and ethical guidelines are essential to prevent scenarios where AI could exploit the human brain.

    As we advance technologically, it’s crucial to remember that the ultimate goal of AI should be to serve and enhance humanity, not to dominate or replace it.

    Humanity stands at a pivotal juncture in its evolutionary trajectory, where we possess the unprecedented power to shape our future and redefine what it means to be human. This concept aligns with the ideas of biotechnological and artificial intelligence advancements, which significantly influence our evolution. According to Bostrom (2005), we are transitioning towards a posthuman era where enhancements in cognitive, physical, and emotional capacities could radically transform human nature itself . Additionally, Fukuyama (2002) warns that altering our biological makeup could lead to the erosion of fundamental human qualities, potentially leading to a form of extinction that is not physical but existential.

    Losing our humanity is as grave a peril as facing extinction, for in both we lose the essence of our existence.

    This perspective underscores the importance of carefully considering the ethical and societal implications of our technological advancements, as they hold the potential to redefine or even diminish the essence of humanity.

    References

    Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford University Press.

    Dawkins, R. (2009). The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution. Free Press.

    Doidge, N. (2007). The Brain That Changes Itself: Stories of Personal Triumph from the Frontiers of Brain Science. Viking Penguin.

    Hao, K. (2019). Training a single AI model can emit as much carbon as five cars in their lifetimes. MIT Technology Review.

    Harari, Y. N. (2014). Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. Harper.

    Koch, C. (2018). The Feeling of Life Itself: Why Consciousness is Widespread but Can’t Be Computed. MIT Press.

    Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83(4), 435-450.

    Penrose, R., & Hameroff, S. (2011). Consciousness in the universe: Neuroscience, quantum space-time geometry, and Orch OR theory. Journal of Cosmology, 14, 1-17.

    Russell, S. (2019). Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control. Viking.

    Seth, A. (2018). Being You: A New Science of Consciousness. Penguin Random House.

    Tononi, G. (2008). Consciousness as integrated information: a provisional manifesto. Biological Bulletin, 215(3), 216-242.

    Dehaene, S., & Lau, H. (2020). The neuronal mechanisms of consciousness: a review. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 21(8), 440-451.

    Hameroff, S. R., & Penrose, R. (2014). Consciousness in the Universe: A Review of the ‘Orch OR’ Theory. Physics of Life Reviews, 11(1), 39-78.

    Tegmark, M. (2015). Consciousness as a State of Matter. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 76, 238-270.

    Fisher, M. P. A. (2015). Quantum Cognition: The possibility of processing with nuclear spins in the brain. Annals of Physics, 362, 593-602.

    Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Follow me on IG@AliMehediOfficial

  • Importance of Openness of AI: Lessons from History

    Importance of Openness of AI: Lessons from History

    Motivation

    I recently read an article about how AI managed to learn Bengali on its own. Some argued that this makes AI dangerous, while others argued that this shows the power of AI.

    The real problem here is the fact that AI had to learn Bengali on its own and was not taught Bengali intentionally. This also indicates that we are not putting enough effort into including non-English data when training AI models.

    Although human languages are similar, there are many nuances that make us all unique. These nuances are not captured when an AI model generates a language based on another language or on limited data. Unsupervised learning often fails to recognize the importance of these nuances.

    Instead of treating AI as a race to see which country or company can achieve dominance first, should we not put more effort into fostering greater cooperation?

    Introduction

    Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly becoming a cornerstone of modern life, shaping everything from the ads we see online to critical decisions in healthcare and criminal justice. However, with great power comes great responsibility, and one of the most pressing issues we face is ensuring that AI is fair and unbiased. Historical lessons teach us the profound benefits of embracing open and diverse knowledge. Instead of creating AI that perpetuates biases or censors information, we should foster a collaborative approach akin to NASA’s International Space Station (ISS) model.

    Fairness and equality should be the foundation of AI models, and not an after-thought.

    Along with openness and transparency, steps should be taken to make, for example, The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, as a foundation of AI models.  We can not achieve that by working in silos. By working together globally, we can develop AI that serves all of humanity fairly.

    Historical Lessons on the Value of Open Knowledge

    The Translation of the Quran and European Renaissance

    During the medieval period, European scholars translated the Quran into Latin and other European languages, significantly impacting the Renaissance. These translations allowed scholars to access a wealth of knowledge preserved and expanded upon by Islamic scholars. This included advancements in mathematics, astronomy, medicine, and philosophy. The introduction of these works into Europe helped ignite the intellectual movement that led to the Renaissance, highlighting the critical importance of cross-cultural knowledge sharing.

    The Renaissance illustrates the profound impact of open knowledge and cross-cultural exchange on societal advancement. Emerging in the 14th century and flourishing through the 17th century, the Renaissance was a period of extraordinary cultural, artistic, and scientific rebirth in Europe. This era was significantly influenced by the translation of classical works from Greek, Roman, and Islamic scholars into Latin and vernacular languages, enabling a broad dissemination of ancient and contemporary knowledge. The intellectual curiosity and openness that defined the Renaissance led to remarkable advancements in various fields, including the arts, sciences, and humanities. Figures such as Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo, and Galileo Galilei epitomized the Renaissance spirit by pushing the boundaries of human knowledge and creativity. This cultural flowering underscores the argument that embracing diverse perspectives and fostering an environment of open inquiry can lead to unprecedented innovation and progress.

    The Great Library of Alexandria

    The Great Library of Alexandria exemplifies the power of an open and inclusive approach to knowledge. During the third and second centuries BC, it was a hub for scholars from various backgrounds and disciplines. Notable figures such as Zenodotus of Ephesus, Callimachus, Apollonius of Rhodes, Eratosthenes of Cyrene, Hero of Alexandria, Aristophanes of Byzantium, and Aristarchus of Samothrace contributed to significant advancements in literature, science, and technology. This confluence of minds and the subsequent generation of knowledge underscored the importance of a diverse intellectual community.

    The Islamic Golden Age and the House of Wisdom

    During the Islamic Golden Age (8th to 14th century), the House of Wisdom in Baghdad became a major intellectual center. Scholars of various cultures and religions worked together to translate and expand upon the knowledge of the ancient Greeks, Persians, Indians, and others. This era saw significant advancements in mathematics, astronomy, medicine, and philosophy, contributing to the global body of knowledge and laying the groundwork for future scientific progress.

    The Printing Revolution in Europe

    The invention of the printing press by Johannes Gutenberg in the mid-15th century revolutionized the spread of knowledge in Europe. The mass production of books broke the monopoly of the literate elite and the Church over knowledge, leading to the Reformation, the Scientific Revolution, and the Enlightenment. The democratization of knowledge through printing fostered intellectual growth and innovation.

    The Spread of Paper-making Technology

    The spread of paper-making technology from China to the Islamic world and then to Europe exemplifies the benefits of shared knowledge. Originating in China around the 2nd century AD, paper-making technology was transmitted through the Silk Road, reaching the Islamic world by the 8th century and Europe by the 12th century. This technology greatly enhanced record-keeping, literature, and education across different cultures, facilitating scientific and cultural advancements.

    The Downfall of China’s Innovation During the Ming and Qing Dynasties

    China’s history offers a cautionary tale about the dangers of isolationism and censorship. During the Ming and Qing dynasties, China adopted inward-looking policies that stifled innovation and restricted the exchange of knowledge. This period saw a significant decline in China’s technological and scientific advancements compared to other parts of the world. The burning of books and suppression of intellectual discourse during the Qin Dynasty further exemplifies the detrimental impact of censorship on progress.

    The Rise of the West

    The West’s ascendancy can be attributed to its embrace of competition, scientific inquiry, property rights, medicine, consumer culture, and a strong work ethic. The Scientific Revolution, spanning the 16th to 18th centuries, was pivotal in this regard. This period was marked by immense advancements due to the open exchange of ideas, such as those promoted by institutions like the Royal Society in England. In stark contrast, regions that suppressed knowledge experienced stagnation. For instance, while Europe flourished with figures like Newton and Galileo pushing scientific boundaries, the Ottoman Empire, despite its earlier scientific achievements, began to fall behind due to its restrictive intellectual policies. This openness in the West fostered rapid innovation and progress, underscoring the profound benefits of embracing diverse perspectives and knowledge.

    CERN: A Beacon of Scientific Collaboration

    The European Organization for Nuclear Research, known as CERN, provides a contemporary example of the power of international cooperation in scientific research. Established in 1954, CERN is one of the world’s largest and most respected centers for scientific research in particle physics. It is a collaborative effort involving 23 member countries and numerous observers and partners worldwide. CERN’s collaborative nature has led to groundbreaking discoveries, including the Higgs boson in 2012, which has significantly advanced our understanding of the fundamental structure of the universe. This model of international collaboration and open knowledge exchange serves as a powerful example of what can be achieved when diverse perspectives and expertise are brought together in the pursuit of common scientific goals.

    The NASA Model: International Space Station

    The International Space Station (ISS) serves as a modern-day example of the benefits of international collaboration. The ISS is a joint project involving NASA, Roscosmos, JAXA, ESA, and CSA. This cooperative endeavor has led to numerous scientific breakthroughs and technological advancements that might not have been possible without such a diverse partnership. The ISS demonstrates how pooling resources, knowledge, and expertise from around the world can lead to remarkable achievements.

    Towards a Universal AGI

    Building on these historical and contemporary examples, the development of AGI should follow a similar path of collaboration and openness. Creating an AI that is free from biases and capable of serving humanity as a whole requires input from diverse cultural, religious, and ethnic backgrounds. By involving a wide range of perspectives, we can ensure that AGI is designed to understand and respect the full spectrum of human experiences and values.

    Censoring AI models based on narrow motivations would lead to biased and limited intelligence, much like how the burning of books in ancient China or the isolationist policies of later dynasties curtailed innovation. Instead, fostering a collaborative approach, akin to the ISS and CERN, would enable the creation of a Universal AGI that benefits all of humanity.

    Conclusion

    History teaches us that openness and collaboration are key drivers of progress and innovation. From the Great Library of Alexandria to the Renaissance spurred by translations of the Quran, to the competitive advancements of the West highlighted by Niall Ferguson, and the setbacks faced by China due to censorship and isolation, the evidence is clear. To avoid repeating the mistakes of the past, AI companies must resist the temptation to censor based on religious, racial, or ethnic motivations. By embracing a universal approach, modeled after successful international collaborations like the ISS and CERN, we can create an AGI that serves the best interests of all humanity.

    References

    1. Burman, T. E. (2007). Reading the Qur’an in Latin Christendom, 1140-1560. University of Pennsylvania Press.
    2. Casson, L. (2001). Libraries in the Ancient World. Yale University Press.
    3. Needham, J. (1954). Science and Civilization in China. Cambridge University Press.
    4. Twitchett, D., & Fairbank, J. K. (1992). The Cambridge History of China. Cambridge University Press.
    5. Al-Khalili, J. (2011). The House of Wisdom: How Arabic Science Saved Ancient Knowledge and Gave Us the Renaissance. Penguin Books.
    6. Eisenstein, E. L. (1979). The Printing Press as an Agent of Change: Communications and Cultural Transformations in Early-Modern Europe. Cambridge University Press.
    7. Hunter, D. (1943). Papermaking: The History and Technique of an Ancient Craft. Dover Publications.
    8. Burke, P. (1986). The Italian Renaissance: Culture and Society in Italy. Princeton University Press.
    9. Brotton, J. (2006). The Renaissance Bazaar: From the Silk Road to Michelangelo. Oxford University Press.
    10. Burke, P. (1998). The European Renaissance: Centres and Peripheries. Wiley-Blackwell.
    11. Ferguson, N. (2011). Civilization: The West and the Rest. Penguin Books.
    12. Grafton, A. (2007). What Was History? The Art of History in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge University Press.
    13. Harland, D. M. (2020). The Story of the International Space Station. Springer-Praxis.
    14. CERN. (n.d.). About CERN. Retrieved from CERN Website.

    Follow me on IG@AliMehediOfficial

  • My Naked Universe: Rethinking Perception Through the Lens of Gravity and Entanglement

    My Naked Universe: Rethinking Perception Through the Lens of Gravity and Entanglement

    Author: Ali Mehedi

    Introduction

    The pursuit of understanding the universe has been at the heart of human curiosity since the dawn of time. From ancient stargazers to modern theoretical physicists, our quest has been driven by the desire to decipher the cosmos’ inner workings. However, the tools and senses we rely on for this exploration come with inherent limitations. We perceive the universe primarily through light, but what if we could transcend this boundary? Imagine a world where gravity and quantum entanglement are the primary lenses through which we observe reality—a universe unveiled in its purest form, stripped of the biases of light.

    The Limits of Light-Based PerceptionHuman vision is deeply tied to light, which allows us to see objects, colors, and movements. However, this dependency restricts our ability to perceive the finer details of the universe. We can’t directly see molecules, atoms, or the subatomic particles that form the foundation of all matter. Our brains process a limited spectrum of light, and beyond that lies a realm of unseen complexities. As renowned physicist Richard Feynman once said, “Nature’s imagination is so much greater than man’s.” The universe itself does not possess color—light does. We are confined to a visual interpretation shaped by photons, which can only reveal so much.

    A New Medium of Vision: Gravity

    What if our perception of the universe was based on gravity instead of light? Gravity, unlike light, influences every particle in the universe, from the smallest subatomic particle to the largest galaxies. If our brains were tuned to sense gravitational fields, we might perceive a world without color, where the invisible becomes visible. Imagine seeing the gentle pull of gravity between every atom, feeling the weight of a black hole’s immense influence across light years, or observing the curvature of space-time directly.

    This concept aligns with general relativity, where gravity is not just a force but the warping of space and time itself. Albert Einstein’s theory suggests that massive objects cause a distortion in space-time, which we perceive as gravity. If our senses were adapted to this distortion, we might witness the universe in its rawest form—a complex web of interactions without the limitations imposed by light. “If you could see gravity, you’d see the universe differently,” says theoretical physicist Lisa Randall, reflecting on the untapped potential of perceiving the universe through gravity.

    The Power of Entanglement: Seeing Beyond Light Years

    Quantum entanglement, one of the most perplexing phenomena in physics, offers a glimpse into a universe where the limits of space and time are transcended. Entangled particles remain connected regardless of distance; a change in one instantly affects the other, even if they are millions of light years apart. This concept challenges our traditional understanding of locality and opens up the possibility of perceiving the universe in a way that is not bound by distance or the speed of light.

    Imagine using the entanglement of particles as a mechanism for “seeing” across vast stretches of space instantaneously. This would allow us to observe events happening millions of light years away as if they were right in front of us. It’s as though the universe is one vast, interconnected web, with information flowing seamlessly across its entirety. Through the gravitational influence of entangled particles, we could refine our “vision,” detecting even the most subtle shifts in space-time. This would be a true “naked universe,” where every nuance of cosmic interaction is laid bare, without the veil of light.

    The Drop in the Ice Block: Can We Truly Understand?

    A fundamental question arises from this thought experiment: Can we fully understand the universe if we are part of it? The analogy of a drop of water inside an ice block captures this conundrum perfectly. Can the drop comprehend the entirety of the ice and water system it resides in? Similarly, we are floating within the universe, made of the same particles and forces we are trying to understand.

    Our traditional means of observation are limited by the fact that we are part of the system we seek to study. This is reminiscent of the observer effect in quantum mechanics, where the act of observation itself alters the state of what is being observed. “The more precisely the position is determined, the less precisely the momentum is known,” stated Werner Heisenberg, highlighting the inherent uncertainty in understanding systems from within.

    Imagining an Alternative World

    Envision a universe where we could perceive all interactions, from the pull of a distant star to the spin of an electron, through gravity and entanglement. Such a perception would strip away the biases of light, revealing a cosmos far more intricate and interconnected than we currently fathom. The colorless, dynamic reality of this “naked universe” would be a testament to the complexity and beauty of existence—one that transcends the limitations of human senses.

    While we may never fully escape our perceptual constraints, imagining these alternative visions pushes the boundaries of how we think about the universe and our place within it. It reminds us that, as observers embedded in the fabric of reality, our understanding is perpetually evolving. The universe, in all its grandeur, may always remain partially shrouded in mystery, but our relentless curiosity drives us ever closer to its secrets.

    Conclusion

    The journey to understand the universe is as much about overcoming our limitations as it is about expanding our knowledge. By exploring the possibilities of perceiving through gravity and entanglement, we open new doors to imagining the cosmos in ways that defy conventional understanding. As we continue to push the boundaries of science, we must embrace the idea that our universe, however complex, is a reflection of our quest to see beyond what is visible—to truly glimpse the naked universe.

    References:

    1. Greene, Brian. The Fabric of the Cosmos: Space, Time, and the Texture of Reality.
    2. Randall, Lisa. Warped Passages: Unraveling the Mysteries of the Universe’s Hidden Dimensions.
    3. Heisenberg, Werner. Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science.
    4. Einstein, Albert. Relativity: The Special and General Theory.
    5. Feynman, Richard. The Pleasure of Finding Things Out.

    Follow me on IG@AliMehediOfficial

  • Understanding High-Value Men and Women: A Modern Perspective

    Understanding High-Value Men and Women: A Modern Perspective

    In recent years, the concept of being “high-value” has gained popularity, particularly in online culture and self-improvement circles. This idea revolves around the traits and behaviors that supposedly make someone more attractive, successful, and respected in society. While the term is frequently associated with men, the notion of a “high-value” woman is also part of this discourse, leading to a broader conversation about human worth and relationships. Let’s dive into what defines high-value men and women, and then explore the moral implications of these evaluations, especially in the context of traditional concepts of love and family.

    What is a High-Value Man?

    A high-value man is often described as the “full package.” He is confident, assertive, emotionally intelligent, and purposeful. This type of man has a clear sense of direction in life, works hard to achieve his goals, and is constantly striving for self-improvement—whether that’s through learning, physical fitness, or emotional growth. He is seen as resilient, responsible, and someone who lifts others up while pursuing his own success.

    Key traits of a high-value man include:

    • Purpose-Driven: He sets clear goals and intentionally works towards them, balancing his professional pursuits with personal fulfillment.
    • Supportive of Others: He uplifts those around him, sharing his success and offering help, whether in professional settings or personal relationships.
    • Emotionally and Physically Strong: He demonstrates resilience and seeks to maintain his physical and mental health.
    • Confident and Assertive: He knows what he wants, communicates effectively, and stands up for his values and boundaries.
    • Maintains Healthy Relationships: He surrounds himself with positive, like-minded individuals and fosters strong, respectful connections.

    What is a High-Value Woman?

    Similarly, a high-value woman is defined by her confidence, independence, and ability to nurture and grow within her relationships. She is seen as emotionally intelligent, self-assured, and committed to personal and professional growth. A high-value woman values self-care, sets and maintains her boundaries, and seeks relationships that are mutually supportive and respectful.

    Key traits of a high-value woman include:

    • Self-Confidence: She exudes self-assurance and has a strong sense of her own worth, which isn’t dependent on external validation.
    • Independence and Purpose: She is driven by her own goals and aspirations, striving for success in her career, personal interests, or family life.
    • Emotional Intelligence: She is empathetic, self-aware, and skilled at managing her own emotions and understanding those of others.
    • Healthy Relationships: She chooses partners and friends who respect her boundaries, support her growth, and share her values.
    • Commitment to Self-Care: A high-value woman takes care of herself physically, emotionally, and mentally, understanding that self-care is foundational to her overall well-being.

    The Moral Implications of Evaluating Individuals as “High-Value”

    While the high-value framework provides a set of aspirational traits, it also raises significant moral and ethical questions. These evaluations often conflict with traditional ideas of love, family, and human worth. Here are some of the key concerns:

    1. Reinforcement of Stereotypes and Gender Roles: Labeling people as “high-value” often perpetuates outdated gender roles and stereotypes, which can limit individual expression and freedom. It reduces complex individuals to simplified ideals of masculinity or femininity.
    2. Objectification and Reductionism: By turning human worth into a checklist of traits, the high-value concept can objectify individuals, overlooking their intrinsic value and reducing them to external attributes like success or attractiveness.
    3. Promotion of Inequality and Hierarchies: This approach can create implicit hierarchies, suggesting that some people are inherently more valuable than others based on subjective standards. This undermines the principle of equal respect for all individuals and can breed exclusion and elitism.
    4. Impact on Mental Health and Self-Worth: The pressure to constantly meet high-value standards can harm mental health, leading to anxiety, depression, or feelings of inadequacy. It shifts the focus from internal fulfillment to external validation.
    5. Neglect of Moral and Ethical Qualities: High-value evaluations often emphasize traits like success and confidence over deeper moral and ethical qualities such as kindness, integrity, and compassion, which are fundamental to genuine human connections.

    Conflict with Traditional Concepts of Love and Family

    Traditional ideas of love and family emphasize unconditional acceptance, mutual respect, and shared commitment. In these relationships, worth is not measured by achievements or external qualities but is rooted in the intrinsic value of each individual. Here’s how the high-value framework conflicts with these traditional views:

    • Conditional vs. Unconditional Value: Traditional love and family provide a space of unconditional support, where individuals are valued for who they are. In contrast, the high-value concept suggests that worth is conditional on meeting specific standards.
    • Focus on Individual Achievement vs. Collective Well-being: While traditional family values prioritize collective well-being and mutual sacrifice, the high-value mindset emphasizes individual success, which can create conflicts within family dynamics.
    • Transactional vs. Relational Approach: Traditional relationships are based on deep emotional bonds and shared experiences, whereas high-value evaluations can make relationships feel transactional, where worth is assessed based on specific traits.
    • Emphasis on Stability and Commitment: Traditional family structures value long-term commitment and enduring challenges together. The high-value approach, with its focus on constant self-optimization, may lead individuals to prioritize personal goals over relationship stability.

    Conclusion

    The high-value concept offers an idealized vision of personal success and worth, but it also raises ethical concerns, particularly in how it intersects with traditional views of love and family. While striving for self-improvement and success is positive, it’s important to balance these pursuits with values of unconditional acceptance, equality, and genuine human connection. True worth is not just about meeting external standards but also about embracing the richness and complexity of being human, where love, family, and relationships play a central role.

    Follow me on IG@AliMehediOfficial